By: Dr. Coni Horndli
An Exon Splice Enhancer Primes
IGF2:IGF2R Binding Site Structure and Function Evolution
Christopher Williams,1* Hans-Jürgen
Hoppe,2* Dellel Rezgui,2 Madeleine Strickland,1 Briony E. Forbes,3 Frank
Grutzner,3 Susana Frago,2 Rosamund Z. Ellis,1 Pakorn Wattana-Amorn,1 Stuart N.
Prince,2 Oliver J. Zaccheo,2 Catherine M. Nolan,4 Andrew J. Mungall,5 E. Yvonne
Jones,6 Matthew P. Crump,1† A. Bassim Hassan2†
ABSTRACT
Placental development and genomic
imprinting coevolved with parental conflict over resource distribution to
mammalian offspring. The imprinted genes IGF2 and IGF2R code for the growth
promoter insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) and its inhibitor, mannose
6-phosphate (M6P)/IGF2 receptor (IGF2R), respectively. M6P/IGF2R of birds and
fish do not recognize IGF2. In monotremes, which lack imprinting, IGF2
specifically bound M6P/IGF2R via a hydrophobic CD loop. We show that the DNA
coding the CD loop in monotremes functions as an exon splice enhancer (ESE) and
that structural evolution of binding site loops (AB, HI, FG) improved therian
IGF2 affinity. We propose that ESE evolution led to the fortuitous acquisition
of IGF2 binding by M6P/IGF2R that drew IGF2R into parental conflict; subsequent
imprinting may then have accelerated affinity maturation.
COMMENT
This report published by Matthew
Crump’s and Bassim Hassan’s groups this week in Science analyses the
evolutionary molecular changes, which led to high affinity binding of IGF2R to
IGF2 in mammals but not birds and reptiles. IGF2 and IGF2R are two of the
roughly 100 canonically imprinted genes found in mammals, with IGF2 expressed
only from the paternal allele and IGF2R only from the maternal allele. In mice,
deletion of the maternal IGF2R gene results in overly large offspring while deletion
of the paternal IGF2 gene results in dwarf offspring. In humans, only IGF2 is
imprinted but not its receptor. Activation of the maternal IGF2 allele causes
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which is characterized large body size at birth
and an increased risk for childhood cancer. The reciprocal expression of IGF2
and IGF2R underscores the parental conflict over the distribution of resources
to their offspring. This hypothesis is based on the theory that mothers want to
distribute their resources equally to all their current and future offspring,
while fathers favor the maternal investment into the current offspring.
This study correlates the appearance of
IGF2/R with the occurrence of their monoallelic expression. Specifically,
Williams et al. show that binding appeared in all primitive mammals, while
imprinting is only found in theria, such as rodents, kangaroos and opossums.
Therefore, the authors hypothesize that the evolution of IGF2/R imprinting was
facilitated by the appearance of their molecular binding, which may conversely
have accelerated the selection for improved regulation of IGF2 through IGF2R.
This report thoroughly reveals the
structural changes that lead to IGF2:IGF2R complex formation but falls short on
explaining the mechanism of how IGF2/R binding facilitates genomic imprinting
of these two genes.
2 comments:
The mechanism, in evolutionary terms, is probably parental conflict. The mannose 6-phosphate receptor without IGF2 binding site would not have been imprinted since it would not have controlled foetal growth. The molecular mechanism for imprinting was probably derived from the machinery for controlling LTR retrotransposon spread, which is not available to monotremes, but evolved in theria. When drawn into parental conflict by binding IGF2 in monotremes IGF2R became a target for imprinting in therians.
Many thanks for your comment.
Post a Comment