Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Thanks for the Histones, Mom!

Several papers have emerged over the last year or so indicating transgenerational effects that influence the behavior and/or physiology of offspring. For example, a recent study in Nature from Margaret Morris's group at the University of New South Wales proposes that obese father's transmit an epigenetic signature through the germ line to female offspring, resulting in impaired beta cell function, impaired insulin secretion and glucose intolerance (Ng et al. Nature 2010). Other recent studies have found similar evidence for paternal inheritance of non-genetic information (for example, see Pentinat et al. Endocrinology 2010; Nelson et al. Epigenomics 2010). However, an outstanding issue relates to the identity of the underlying molecular mechanisms that are involved in these effects. In this blog entry, I highlight some emerging pathways that might potentially contribute to epigenetic inheritance through the germ line.

Two major studies have characterized modified histones in human and mouse sperm (Hammoud et al. Nature 2009; Brykczynska et al. Nat Struc Mol Biol 2010). Previously, it was thought that modified histones were unlikely to be a major component of the highly compact chromatin contained in sperm. However, these two studies indicate that approximately 30% of human promoters contain modified histones. Further, many of these epigenetic signatures are conserved between humans and mice. It has been postulated that these histone signatures are retained in the zygote and play an important role at early stages of development in offspring. However, direct evidence for this model is not yet strong. Interestingly, two noteworthy studies in C. elegans suggest that modified histones established in the parental germ cells transmit essential information to offspring through the germ line (Furuhashi et al. Epigenetics 2010; Rechtsteiner et al. PLoS Genetics 2010).

Both of these studies pickup on an older study by Susan Strome's group, in which she found 6 loci, including the H3K36 methyltransferase MES–4 [an NSD homolog], that are required for normal germ cell development in offspring (Capowski et al. Genetics 1991). Null MES-4 mutant offspring undergo normal germ cell development when MES–4 is expressed by the mother, but not if the mother is homozygous. Thus, a transgenerational maternal effect occurs. In the two most recent studies, it was found that MES–4 establishes H3K36 trimethylated histone marks independent of transcription, and this maternally established epigenetic signature is required for normal germ cell development in offspring. The authors propose that MES–4 transmits a memory of gene expression in the parental germline to offspring.

Taken together, these early observations suggest that epigenetic signatures in the form of modified histones in eggs and/or sperm might impact upon gene expression and the development and physiology of offspring.

4 comments:

Charles Stromeyer Jr. said...

Hi, I want to mention for you and your readers these 4 new papers about genomic imprinting and the brain:

[1] Qureshi IA, Mehler MF. Genetic and epigenetic underpinnings of sex differences in the brain and in neurological and psychiatric disease susceptibility. Prog Brain Res. 2010;186:77-95.

[2] Leung KN, et al. Neuronal chromatin dynamics
of imprinting in development and disease. J Cell Biochem. 2010 Nov 22. [Epub ahead of print]

[3] Arai JA, Feig LA. Long-lasting and transgenerational effects of an environmental enrichment on memory formation. Brain Res Bull. 2010 Nov 13. [Epub ahead of print]

[4] Popkie AP, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling via glycogen synthase kinase-3 (Gsk-3) regulates DNA methylation of imprinted loci. J Biol Chem. 2010 Nov 3. [Epub ahead of print]

Aiyun Wen said...

I didn't just inherit looks outside from you, but also characteristic inside, Mom and Dad!

Aiyun Wen said...

Dr. Chris, I have red a review paper “Decoding the Epigenetic Language of Neuronal Plasticity” published on Neuron which impressed a lot! It addressed that:
Chromatin remodeling (dynamic changes in histone modifications like H3S10 phosphorylation and H3K14 acetylation) occurs in hippocampal neurons of the dentate gyrus after administering kainic acid to a mouse.
Signaling mediated by dopamine receptor is envisaged to control chromatin remodeling via modulation of various enzymatic functions. By using either the ERK transduction pathway or the alternative AKT/GSK-3 signaling system, dopamine could control kinases that phosphorylate H3, such as Rsk2 and MSK1, or the enzymatic function of HATs, such as CBP or CLOCK. The GSK-3 kinase is inhibited by lithium and thereby is implicated in the treatment of mood disorders. These regulatory pathways may integrate circadian control, dopamine signaling, and chromatin remodeling.
I thought all these above might partially answer one of your questions--“Do environmental factors (eg. diet or drugs) influence the establishment and/or regulation of imprinted genes in the brain?  In what ways do environmental factors influence offspring brain function and behavior?”
What do you think? Looking forward to your opinion and comment!

Panic Attacks said...

These research studies do show that epigenetic signatures in the form of modified histones in eggs and/or sperm might impact upon gene expression and the development and physiology of offspring. It's not just the way you look, it might be the pattern of the way you think and respond to situations also, more than just how your parents raise you. Thanks for this highly informative article.